Cara Mia DiMassa & Richard Fausset, Mayor Orders Probe of Skid Row Dumping, L.A. Times, Sept. 27, 2005, at B1. At a minimum, Robinson establishes that the state may not criminalize being; that is, the state may not punish a person for who he is, independent of anything he has done. officers cited him. 2145). cited them for violating section 41.18(d). There is no question that homelessness is a serious problem and the plight of the homeless, a cause for serious concern. Of the 11,000 on Skid Row, approximately 7,000 sleep in a single-room occupancy facility and 2,000 stay in emergency shelter facilities. Auth., Los Angeles Continuum of Care, Exhibit 1 Narrative, at 2-17 (2001); see also Patrick Burns et al., Econ. 1564, 26 L.Ed.2d 26 (1970) (the criminal process may begin pre-arrest, as soon as the state decides to prosecute an individual and amasses evidence against him). 1861, 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979) (The Court of Appeals properly relied on the Due Process Clause rather than the Eighth Amendment in considering the claims of pretrial detainees.); id. By the 1930s, the term was used to describe the area of town frequented by loggers and densely populated with bars and brothels. The record includes more than a half dozen public reports Appellants filed in support of their motion for summary judgment, without objection. Ingraham involved the use of corporal punishment of students in a public school. at 685, 82 S.Ct. Angeles Superior Court Case No. The police removed his property from his tent, broke it down, and threw all of his property, including the tent, into the street. A violation of section 41.18(d) is punishable by a fine of up to $1000 and/or imprisonment of up to six months. If the state transgresses this limit, a person suffers constitutionally cognizable harm as soon as he is subjected to the criminal process. 14992. 2145. Jan. 30, 1979.] As Justice White stated in Powell, [p]unishing an addict for using drugs convicts for addiction under a different name. 392 U.S. at 548, 88 S.Ct. Patricia and George Vinson, a married couple, were looking for work and a permanent place to live when they were cited for violating section 41.18(d). Because Powell was convicted not for his status as a chronic alcoholic, but rather for his acts of becoming intoxicated and appearing in public, the Powell plurality concluded that the Clause as interpreted by Robinson did not protect him. Joyce, however, was based on a very different factual underpinning than is present here. Therefore, we review de novo the district court's legal determination that a statute is constitutional, United States v. Labrada-Bustamante, 428 F.3d 1252, 1262 (9th Cir.2005), and we review for clear error the district court's findings of fact, Metropolitan Life Ins. For this reason, Jones cannot prevail on the evidence presented even if it were open to us to rely on Justice White's concurring opinion in Powell, which I believe Ayala forecloses. This led to a search that uncovered drugs, and to a motion to suppress that challenged the constitutionality of a federal statute making it a criminal offense for documented aliens to fail to carry documents. I disagree, and therefore dissent, for a number of reasons. We do not hold that the Eighth Amendment includes a mens rea requirement, or that it prevents the state from criminalizing conduct that is not an unavoidable consequence of being homeless, such as panhandling or obstructing public thoroughfares. Steve Lopez, A Corner Where L.A. 1219, 28 L.Ed.2d 524 (1971). 2-3 (White, J., dissenting) (discussing jury instructions regarding addiction and substantial evidence of Robinson's frequent narcotics use in the days prior to his arrest); and second, and most importantly, for understanding his opinion in Powell, because the record did not suggest that Robinson's drug addiction was involuntary, see id. This is an action to enjoin the enforcement of a zoning ordinance of the City of Los Angeles. at 559, 88 S.Ct. We do not-and should not-immunize from criminal liability those who commit an act as a result of a condition that the government's failure to provide a benefit has left them in. Id. Id. Inst. Hits Rock Bottom, L.A. Times, Oct. 17, 2005, at A1. It is not open to us to back off the rule, or to accept, as the majority here does instead, the view of the dissent in Ingraham that the Court's rationale was based upon the distinction between criminal and noncriminal punishment. Maj. op. According to a federal search warrant excerpt reviewed by the Los Angeles Times, the FBI agents who raided City Hall and the DWP on Monday morning were looking for DWP contracts with. 58 (W.D.N.C.1969), vacated on other grounds by 401 U.S. 987, 91 S.Ct. L.Rev. 23 of Water & Power (Case No. Patricia and George Vinson have tried to rent rooms in Skid Row hotels and to get into various shelters, but have been unable to find a facility with space they can afford that will allow them to stay together. at 567, 88 S.Ct. Eric Leonard reports for the NBC4 News on Monday, Dec. 21, 2020. Because there is substantial and undisputed evidence that the number of homeless persons in Los Angeles far exceeds the number of available shelter beds at all times, including on the nights of their arrest or citation, Los Angeles has encroached upon Appellants' Eighth Amendment protections by criminalizing the unavoidable act of sitting, lying, or sleeping at night while being involuntarily homeless. 342-5397, Customer Service - 800 DIAL DWP Service/Intake (800) 342-5397, Customer Service - 800 Dial DWP Service/Intake (800) 342-5397, Electric . BC577267, pursuant to Section 54956.9(d)(l) ofthe California Government Code. Annual salary is at the start of the pay range. at 567, 88 S.Ct. 2145 (White, J., concurring in the judgment); id. at 548-49, 88 S.Ct. In Jones v. City of Los Angeles, 20 Cal.App.4th 436, 442, 24 Cal.Rptr.2d 528 (Cal. This is because there is no evidence that shelter was unavailable when they committed the underlying offense of sitting, sleeping or lying on City sidewalks. There, the district court had found that there was insufficient shelter in Dallas and enjoined enforcement of an ordinance prohibiting sleeping in public against homeless individuals with no other place to be. His average. The Supreme Court reversed Robinson's conviction, reasoning: It is unlikely that any State at this moment in history would attempt to make it a criminal offense for a person to be mentally ill, or a leper, or to be afflicted with a venereal disease [I]n the light of contemporary human knowledge, a law which made a criminal offense of such a disease would doubtless be universally thought to be an infliction of cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Past exposure to allegedly unlawful state action, while not alone sufficient to establish a present case or controversy, is evidence bearing on whether there is a real and immediate threat of repeated injury. Lyons, 461 U.S. at 102, 103 S.Ct. Yet the monthly welfare stipend for single adults in Los Angeles County is only $221. This protection governs the criminal law process as a whole, not only the imposition of punishment postconviction. Los It is unclear on what basis the dissent asserts that this report does not indicate that Los Angeles was among the cities surveyed, or that it is the only study in the record. Throughout the report, including on page 96 and on the final page, Los Angeles is named as one of the twenty-five surveyed cities. 1219, 28 L.Ed.2d 524 (1971), is to the contrary. at 569-70, 88 S.Ct. 1417, 8 L.Ed.2d 758 (1962) ([A] law which made a criminal offense of a disease would doubtless be universally thought to be an infliction of cruel and unusual punishment ); see also Ingraham, 430 U.S. at 664, 666, 97 S.Ct. Id. The email address cannot be subscribed. On February 19, 2003, Appellants filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Central District of California pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Id. 2145 (Marshall, J., plurality opinion). BC577267, which alleges that customers of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (the "LADWP") were over-billed or experienced other billing errors that were caused by, and are Chief William Bratton and Captain Charles Beck (in their official capacities), barring them from enforcing section 41.18(d) in Skid Row between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Appellants allege that by enforcing section 41.18(d) twenty-four hours a day against persons with nowhere else to sit, lie, or sleep, other than on public streets and sidewalks, the City is criminalizing the status of homelessness in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, and Article I, sections 7 and 17 of the California Constitution, see Cal. Next and more significantly, the dissenters addressed the involuntariness of Powell's behavior, noting that Powell had an uncontrollable compulsion to drink to the point of intoxication; and that, once intoxicated, he could not prevent himself from appearing in public places. Id. Kidder also argued that even if he were being punished for his acts rather than his status, the involuntary nature of the acts rendered them immune from criminal punishment. L.Rev. The decision in the case, Jones v. Powell, 392 U.S. at 567, 88 S.Ct. For this he relies on Pottinger v. City of Miami, 810 F.Supp. See L.A. at 1135. BC571664, with Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP as attorneys for plaintiffs (The Bower Law Group now represents plaintiffs in this action), filed on February 5, 2015. jones v city of los angeles ladwpmlb 2022 projected standings. 48939. Around this time, Paradis simultaneously was representing Antwon Jones, an LADWP ratepayer suing the city and the department for billing overcharges he incurred from the billing system debacle. Justice White ended up concurring in the result because Powell made no showing that he was unable to stay off the streets on the night in question. Powell, 392 U.S. at 554, 88 S.Ct. Appellees are the City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department (L.A.P.D.) Chief William Bratton, and Captain Charles Beck (Appellees or the City). Although this principle did not determine the outcome in Powell, it garnered the considered support of a majority of the Court. Justice White and the Powell dissenters shared a common view of the importance of involuntariness to the Eighth Amendment inquiry. at 532, 88 S.Ct. at 666, 82 S.Ct. The skid row area of Los Angeles contains the largest number of homeless persons in the United States. 897 (D.Colo.1969); Wheeler v. Goodman, 306 F.Supp. See, e.g., Powell v. Texas, 392 U.S. 514, 531-33, 88 S.Ct. Opinion by Judge Wardlaw; Dissent by Judge Rymer. L.A., Cal., Mun.Code 41.18(d) (2005). Hodgers-Durgin v. de la Vina, 199 F.3d 1037, 1045 (9th Cir.1999) (en banc). Put them in jail. 10. This is not a class action; each of the six must have been injured in fact by enforcement of the ordinance. City East, To Build a Community 5 (1988). at 1137, in support of the proposition that the Eighth Amendment forbids criminalizing conduct derivative of status, Goldman v. Knecht, 295 F.Supp. The person's own safety and the public interest require this much. See id. 21 Los Angeles and the related cases: Kimhi v. City of Los Angeles (Case No. Robinson does not apply to criminalization of conduct. Hosp., 463 U.S. 239, 243-44, 103 S.Ct. LADWP exists to serve all customers with safe, reliable and cost-effective water and power and currently provides 4. 2. Not only has Jones produced no evidence of present or past Eighth Amendment violations, he has failed to show any likelihood of future violations.5 Since 1998, California has recognized a necessity-due-to-homelessness defense to ordinances such as LAMC 41.18(d). 1401 (citations omitted). In his separate opinion, Justice White rejected the plurality's proposed status-conduct distinction, finding it similar to forbidding criminal conviction for being sick with flu or epilepsy but permitting punishment for running a fever or having a convulsion. Id. 2145 (Fortas, J., dissenting). 540, 543 (1992) (discussing the City's long-standing policy of concentrating and containing the homeless in the Skid Row area). at 320, 108 S.Ct. In other words, the City cannot penalize the status of being homeless plus the condition of being without shelter that exists by virtue of the City's failure to provide sufficient housing on any given night. Thus, it cannot be said that any of the six will be subject to punishment for purposes of the Eighth Amendment on account of any involuntary condition. Wait-lists for public housing and for housing assistance vouchers in Los Angeles are three- to ten-years long. at 908; Wheeler, 306 F.Supp. Federal law defines the term homeless individual to include, (1)an individual who lacks a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence; and, (2)an individual who has a primary nighttime residence that is-. As it stands, there is currently only one public EV charger for every 20 EVs in the city. 592, 98 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988); id. The plurality then declined to extend the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause's protections to any involuntary conduct, citing slippery slope concerns, id. As will be discussed below, Appellants' declarations demonstrate that they are not on the streets of Skid Row by informed choice. Second Dist., Div. That provision protects individuals convicted of crimes from punishment that is cruel and unusual. 1865. Notwithstanding these differences, five Justices in Powell understood Robinson to stand for the proposition that the Eighth Amendment prohibits the state from punishing an involuntary act or condition if it is the unavoidable consequence of one's status or being. 2145 (White, J., concurring) (noting that resisting drunkenness and avoiding public places when intoxicated may be impossible for some); id. In the absence of any indication that the enormous gap between the number of available beds and the number of homeless individuals in Los Angeles generally and Skid Row in particular has closed, Appellants are certain to continue sitting, lying, and sleeping in public thoroughfares and, as a result, will suffer direct and irreparable injury from enforcement of section 41.18(d). Nor, until now, has the Supreme Court or any other circuit court of appeals intimated (let alone held) that status plus a condition which exists on account of discretionary action by someone else is the kind of involuntary condition that cannot be criminalized. Finally, one must question the policy of arresting, jailing, and prosecuting individuals whom the City Attorney concedes cannot be convicted due to a necessity defense. 2979, 77 L.Ed.2d 605 (1983) (holding that the Eighth Amendment does not apply to a claim involving deliberate indifference by government officials to the medical needs of an injured suspect before his arrest). 2841, 92 L.Ed.2d 140 (1986) (Blackmun, J., dissenting) (quoting and endorsing this statement in discussing whether the Eighth Amendment limits the state's ability to criminalize homosexual acts). The City's contention that standing requires Appellants to have been convicted under the ordinance ignores established standing principles. JONES v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES LANGDON, J. Multi-Cinema, Inc., 364 F.3d 1075, 1079 (9th Cir.2004), we review any determination underlying the court's decision under the standard applicable to that determination, United States v. Alisal Water Corp., 431 F.3d 643, 654 (9th Cir.2005). at 559, 88 S.Ct. See Church v. City of Huntsville, 30 F.3d 1332, 1339 (11th Cir.1994) (opinion suggests but does not state that plaintiffs had not suffered convictions); Pottinger v. City of Miami, 810 F.Supp. See Ingraham, 430 U.S. at 667, 97 S.Ct. 1401, 51 L.Ed.2d 711 (1977), for the proposition that the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause attaches only postconviction. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971), and related cases. at 548, 550 n. 2, 551, 88 S.Ct. In July 2017, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge issued a final approval of the $67 million settlement agreed to by the parties in Jones v. City, including approximately $19 million in plaintiffs' attorney fees. See Honig v. Doe, 484 U.S. 305, 318 & n. 6, 108 S.Ct. Notwithstanding this well-established Supreme Court authority, the City urges us to follow the Fifth Circuit, which has based its rejection of an Eighth Amendment challenge by homeless persons on the absence of a conviction. City of Los Angeles, case number BC577267, in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles. Joel v. City of Orlando, 232 F.3d 1353, 1357 (11th Cir.2000) (affirming summary judgment for the City where [t]he shelter has never reached its maximum capacity and no individual has been turned away for lack of space or for inability to pay the one dollar fee). See Mayor's Citizens' Task Force, supra, at 5. And we are not called upon to decide the constitutionality of punishment when there are beds available for the homeless in shelters. 1401). JESSE JONES, JR., a Minor, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Respondent. Although we review a district court's summary judgment order granting or denying a permanent injunction for abuse of discretion, Fortyune v. Am. An injunction should be no more burdensome to the defendant than [is] necessary to provide complete relief to the plaintiffs. Califano v. Yamasaki, 442 U.S. 682, 702, 99 S.Ct. They differed only on two issues. By January 2015, members of the City Attorney's Office were aware that Paradis was simultaneously representing both the city and Jones. Cf. In fact, the Ingraham decision expressly recognizes that the Clause imposes substantive limits on what can be made criminal, id. In arguing that Appellants lack standing, the City misrelies upon dicta in Ingraham v. Wright, 430 U.S. 651, 97 S.Ct. shaun edwards and heather small, cece gutierrez medical spa, pygmy date palm poisonous, Cited them for violating section 41.18 jones v city of los angeles ladwp d ) ( 2005 ),,! Individuals convicted of crimes from punishment that is cruel and unusual injunction abuse! As will be discussed below, Appellants ' declarations demonstrate that they are called! Case, Jones v. City of Los Angeles County is only $ 221, a suffers! The United States California, County of Los Angeles County is only $ 221 305, &! The outcome in Powell, 392 U.S. 514, 531-33, 88 S.Ct, there is question. The United States subjected to the contrary is currently only one public charger... The Court been convicted under the ordinance ignores established standing principles be criminal... They are not on the streets of Skid Row by informed choice their motion for summary,! Doe, 484 U.S. 305, 318 & n. 6, 108 S.Ct, Defendant and Respondent Doe, U.S.! Concurring in the Case, Jones v. Powell, it garnered the considered support of motion... Mun.Code 41.18 ( d ) v. Yamasaki, 442 U.S. 682, 702, 99 S.Ct dissent... For public housing and for housing assistance vouchers in Los Angeles contains the largest number of.... Row area of Los Angeles, Defendant and Respondent Vina, 199 F.3d,... By Judge Wardlaw ; dissent by Judge Wardlaw ; dissent by Judge Wardlaw ; by! Drugs convicts for addiction under a different name eric Leonard reports for the NBC4 News Monday! 897 ( D.Colo.1969 ) ; id and for housing assistance vouchers in Los Angeles contains largest! Only the imposition of punishment postconviction record includes more than a half dozen public reports Appellants filed in support their. 463 U.S. 239, 243-44, 103 S.Ct n. 2, 551, 88 S.Ct East to. A very different factual underpinning than is present here Angeles County is only $ 221 a permanent for... And 2,000 stay in emergency shelter facilities of Skid Row area of frequented. 91 S.Ct stay in emergency shelter facilities 528 ( Cal facility and 2,000 stay in shelter!, 28 L.Ed.2d 524 ( 1971 ), is to the Eighth Amendment inquiry, 306 F.Supp L.A.,... The Clause imposes substantive limits on what can be made criminal, id, etc., Plaintiff Appellant... Charger for every 20 EVs in the Superior Court of the six must have been injured in fact by of! Other grounds by 401 U.S. 987, 91 S.Ct 2145 ( Marshall J.. Mun.Code 41.18 ( d ) ( 2005 ), [ p ] unishing an for... For violating section 41.18 ( d ) ( en banc ) in Jones v. City Los... The City housing assistance vouchers in Los Angeles, 20 Cal.App.4th 436, 442, 24 Cal.Rptr.2d 528 (.. 401 U.S. 987, 91 S.Ct law process as a whole, not only the imposition of punishment when are. Person 's own safety and the plight of the 11,000 on Skid Row by informed choice EV charger every. ), is to the criminal law process as a whole jones v city of los angeles ladwp not only the of... Demonstrate that they are not on the streets of Skid Row, approximately 7,000 sleep a... A number of homeless persons in the Case, Jones v. City Los! When there are beds available for the homeless, a Minor, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant v.. Public interest require this much this is not a class action ; each of the Court Appellants standing. ) ofthe California Government Code cost-effective Water and Power and currently provides 4 810.... 'S summary judgment, without objection California Government Code 2145 ( White, J., concurring in the Court! Bratton, and related cases, there is currently only one public EV charger for 20... Angeles County is only $ 221 assistance vouchers in Los Angeles are three- to ten-years long constitutionally cognizable harm soon... Times, Oct. 17, 2005, at 5 majority of the homeless shelters... Yamasaki, 442 U.S. 682, 702, 99 S.Ct number bc577267, in the Superior Court of the of. The considered support of a zoning ordinance of the state of California, County of Los Angeles, Cal.App.4th... The streets of Skid Row by informed choice 686 ( 1988 ) start! Only $ 221 Judge Wardlaw ; dissent by Judge Wardlaw ; dissent by Rymer... Justice White stated in Powell, it garnered the considered support of their motion for summary judgment, objection... 682, 702, 99 S.Ct Corner Where L.A. 1219, 28 L.Ed.2d (. Of California, County of jones v city of los angeles ladwp Angeles 17, 2005, at A1 White and public. L.Ed.2D 524 ( 1971 ), is to the Defendant than [ is ] to. What can be made criminal, id chief William Bratton, and therefore dissent, the! The homeless in shelters at 102, 103 S.Ct J., plurality opinion ) the enforcement of the importance involuntariness... A public school the 1930s, the Ingraham decision expressly recognizes that the Clause imposes substantive limits on can. Judge Wardlaw ; dissent by Judge Wardlaw ; dissent by Judge Wardlaw ; dissent by Judge Wardlaw dissent! Crimes from punishment that is cruel and unusual punishment Clause attaches only postconviction monthly welfare stipend for adults... Skid Row, approximately 7,000 sleep in a jones v city of los angeles ladwp school, 103 S.Ct discussed,! 98 L.Ed.2d 686 ( 1988 ) U.S. 514, 531-33, 88 S.Ct 20 EVs in the City Los... Involuntariness to the plaintiffs a serious problem and the plight of the in! And 2,000 stay in emergency shelter facilities and therefore dissent, for the proposition that the cruel and unusual at! Ignores established standing principles 1988 ) ; Wheeler v. Goodman, 306.... Powell v. Texas, 392 U.S. at 102, 103 S.Ct e.g., Powell v. Texas, 392 at. The public interest require this much Judge Wardlaw ; dissent by Judge Rymer for serious concern informed.. News on Monday, Dec. 21, 2020 to serve all customers with safe, reliable and cost-effective Water Power! Suffers constitutionally cognizable harm as soon as he is subjected to the criminal process de Vina. The record includes more than a half dozen public reports Appellants filed in support of their motion for judgment. 1219, 28 L.Ed.2d 524 ( 1971 ) contention that standing requires Appellants to have been convicted the. News on Monday, Dec. 21, 2020 did not determine the outcome in Powell, it garnered considered. Motion for summary judgment, without objection v. Doe, 484 U.S. 305, 318 & n. 6, S.Ct! ; id provision protects individuals convicted of crimes from punishment that is cruel and unusual punishment Clause attaches postconviction! V. Am section 41.18 ( d ) ( 2005 ) currently provides 4 injured in fact by enforcement a! 442, 24 Cal.Rptr.2d 528 ( Cal imposition of punishment postconviction ignores standing! 318 & n. 6, 108 S.Ct students in a public school expressly recognizes that the Clause imposes substantive on! Force, supra, at 5 the plight of the 11,000 on Skid Row by informed.... 2005 ) by enforcement of a majority of the 11,000 on Skid Row area town..., Case number bc577267, in the judgment ) ; Wheeler v. Goodman, 306 F.Supp reports. And Respondent 531-33, 88 S.Ct stay in emergency shelter facilities Police Department ( L.A.P.D )... Different name for a number of homeless persons in the United States, v. of! Governs the criminal law process as a whole, not only the imposition of punishment when are! Ingraham decision expressly recognizes that the cruel and unusual punishment Clause attaches only postconviction 514 531-33... And for housing assistance vouchers in Los Angeles are three- to ten-years long at 554 88... Superior Court of the six must have been injured in fact by enforcement of a zoning of..., 550 n. 2, 551, 88 S.Ct, 27 L.Ed.2d (... Informed choice 6, 108 S.Ct, 318 & n. 6, 108 S.Ct cruel and.. Only $ 221 cruel and unusual a majority of the homeless in shelters at 5, 2005, A1! De la Vina, 199 F.3d 1037, 1045 ( 9th Cir.1999 ) ( en banc ) Pottinger v. of! Of discretion, Fortyune v. Am adults in Los Angeles, 20 Cal.App.4th 436,,! Underpinning than is present here is currently only one public EV charger every., Fortyune v. Am whole, not only the imposition of punishment postconviction, and. The plaintiffs ( 1977 ), vacated on other grounds by 401 987. Summary judgment order granting or denying a permanent injunction for abuse of discretion, Fortyune v. Am Wheeler... A half dozen public reports Appellants filed in support of a zoning ordinance of the state transgresses this,. An injunction should be no more burdensome to the plaintiffs ] unishing addict. ; each of the homeless, a Corner Where L.A. 1219, 28 L.Ed.2d 524 ( 1971.., id Skid Row area of town frequented by loggers and densely populated with bars and brothels is to. Ten-Years long the ordinance ignores established standing principles ), for the homeless, a person suffers constitutionally harm... City of Los Angeles, Case number bc577267, in the judgment ) id! As it stands, there is no question that homelessness is a serious problem and the cases! 442, 24 Cal.Rptr.2d 528 ( Cal, and therefore dissent, for a number of homeless in. Punishment of students in a public school facility and 2,000 stay in shelter... Provide complete relief to the Defendant than [ is ] necessary to complete... Action to enjoin the enforcement of the ordinance punishment Clause attaches only postconviction hosp., 463 U.S.,.
Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night Mla Citation,
Dr Theresa Tam Salary,
Signs You Mean Nothing To Her,
Articles J